Closed QuocDuong1306 closed 9 months ago
In OCA/edi#759, should we need to move
listeners.py
inedi_sale_ubl_oca
toedi_sale_oca
for common? Because in the future, maybe we need more modules likeedi_sale_ubl_oca
(ex:edi_sale_edifact_oca
,...)
I'd do it only if we think that setting the state is needed in all the other cases is needed. Otherwise, what would you move? An empty listener for create and write?
What is your POV on this?
Yes @simahawk, you're right. We need to move when all standards need setting the state. So please ignore it and could you review this module? Thank a lot
Hi @yvaucher , I updated. When squashing fixup! fixup! Add edi_sale_oca
into Add edi_sale_oca
, it was conflicted. So I squash fixup! fixup! Add edi_sale_oca
into edi_sale: clean file
and change the tile commit to edi_sale: clean file and drop *type_auto dependency
. Thanks
Hi @yvaucher , I updated. When squashing
fixup! fixup! Add edi_sale_oca
intoAdd edi_sale_oca
, it was conflicted. So I squashfixup! fixup! Add edi_sale_oca
intoedi_sale: clean file
and change the tile commit toedi_sale: clean file and drop *type_auto dependency
. Thanks
In theory it should have been squashed on the original PR... :wink:
I updated
/ocabot rebase
Congratulations, PR rebased to 16.0.
/ocabot merge nobump
ah well, the OCA infra is down now... won't get any merge
@simahawk looks like Alexandre fixed the server issue, so the gitbot should be back, would you mind issuing the command again?
/ocabot merge nobump
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-31-by-simahawk-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 9120150eb4828913bdad665af3bac92c1d49b302. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️
Migrate from:
Depends on: