Closed jarmokortetjarvi closed 6 years ago
You forgot oca_dependencies.txt
file from the repo root
I guess the validation module could use one or two unit tests
@mlaitinen that is true
OK, LGTM. The code coverage says you are (at least) not covering some validation cases, such as validating the empty string and an RY-code. Could you see if you could manage to kick the coverage up to a 100 by covering those cases as well?
Sure. I'll add the missing tests
What are those failed codecov checks? I don't understand them.
Also, let's respect the OCA policy for requiring 2 approved reviews per PR in the future.
Accidentally pushed to the upstream :scream: Did a rollback for that. New pull request coming soon...
And here we go #16
Also added the missing branch protection rules to main branches to prevent this kind of mistake
Adds a business id for partners. Split to two modules: one just adds the field and other adds validation and formatting. This way the validation will be optional, and the module can be installed in environments with incorrectly formatted business ids