Closed Tatider closed 4 years ago
Hey @Tatider, thank you for your Pull Request.
It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet. You can read and sign our full Contributor License Agreement here: http://odoo-community.org/page/cla Here is a list of the users:
Appreciation of efforts, OCA CLAbot
Hey @Tatider, thank you for your Pull Request.
It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet. You can read and sign our full Contributor License Agreement here: http://odoo-community.org/page/cla Here is a list of the users:
Appreciation of efforts, OCA CLAbot
@mtnarjan the lint is failing:
l10n_fi_payment_reference/models/account_invoice.py:119:21: E126 continuation line over-indented for hanging indent
@pedrobaeza the tests are failing because of failing to connect to the database:
Testing ['l10n_fi_banks', 'l10n_fi_business_code', 'l10n_fi_business_code_validate', 'l10n_fi_payment_reference']:
createdb: could not connect to database template1: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
Is the server running locally and accepting
connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"?
Is there someone we can contact to help us with this?
That's because a change in Travis infrastructure. Fixed in https://github.com/OCA/l10n-finland/commit/9d3d8f2d5983e391b89c71ff201c2ef7b3501aa0.
Please rebase over new 11.0 branch
Hey @Tatider, We acknowledge that the following users have signed our Contributor License Agreement:
Appreciation of efforts, OCA CLAbot
The coverage check seems to be failing because 10n_fi_payment_reference` doesn't have any tests that make sure that validating invoices actually generates the payment reference as expected. A new test should be added for doing that.
No, % of coverage is the same and test for it is passed (greed highlight). But there is no new test for new changes (red highlight), what impossible in this case because:
The problem is basically that when the code was originally added, this particular coverage check seems to not have been in place. That means that the implementation of invoice_validate
was accepted even though it was not covered by tests. However, now that is no longer OK, and so a test covering invoice_validate
needs to be added, since it was changed.
Rebased commits to be clearer about changes.
This PR has the approved
label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖
/ocabot merge patch
Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you. Prepared branch 11.0-ocabot-merge-pr-30-by-mlaitinen-bump-patch, awaiting test results.
Congratulations, your PR was merged at f6f51770e72c743c948e0d3eadfde1b2842f8070. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️
Always show "Payment Reference Number" for Customers and Vendors invoices.