Closed guewen closed 2 years ago
Never saw a use for the specific fields. It sound a good idea to me to remove l10n_ch_zip and relies only on base_location_geonames_import.
There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. If you want this issue to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.
Some facts:
res.city.zip
(onrp, communitynumber_bfs, ...). I'm not sure that we can find these data with geonames, but I'm not sure we need these fields at allShould we deprecate l10n_ch_zip entirely in favor of base_location_geonames_import? I would be in favor of doing it.