Closed pedrobaeza closed 1 year ago
Hi @ernestotejeda, some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!
As the changes here do not support full domain (still some ids in domain), I continue to believe that usage of web_domain_field is better as domain will be fully evaluated by py.js.
That ID list is very short, so it's good and very traceable.
/ocabot merge minor
On my way to merge this fine PR! Prepared branch 13.0-ocabot-merge-pr-326-by-pedrobaeza-bump-minor, awaiting test results.
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 6e7a84fd69084afb8a4219a9f05770511b9ab4d5. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️
For avoiding a big list of IDs being transferred when no sales order is selected on the RMA, we have changed domains to make use of the possibility of pyjs (http://pyjs.org/) expressions allowed in the domains.
No ternary operators nor list sums are allowed in pyjs, but using a combination of allowed IDs with a controlled length of values + and/or operators to switch domains is enough for having the right performance and avoid to depend on other modules like
web_domain_field
.@Tecnativa