Compatibility with direct-attached and NFS-attached disks

OCFL / Use-Cases

A repository to help capture, track, and discuss use cases for OCFL. Issues-only, please.

7 stars 0 forks source link

Compatibility with direct-attached and NFS-attached disks #3

Closed ahankinson closed 5 years ago

ahankinson commented 6 years ago

The OCFL spec should cover the case of users having direct-attached or NFS/CIFS attached disks.

zimeon commented 6 years ago

So far, I don't see any difference between direct-attached or NFS/CIFS that would impact the OCFL model. It is perhaps a design principle that we consider only file or object (for S3 type stores) level properties, and not block level properties.

ahankinson commented 6 years ago

I think it's the flip-side of #2 -- we need to explicitly state that direct attach or NFS-attach storage is explicitly in-scope.

awoods commented 5 years ago

Supported since v0.1