Closed kba closed 1 year ago
processing_time
as benchmark for a page is only given in the example files and not defined in the schema YAML. Since it's a bit tricky to calculate it I also wanted to know what the overall value of this is. If it doesn't have that much of a value I recommend to toss it and focus on pages_per_minute
instead.
@kba What do you think?
processing_time
as benchmark for a page is only given in the example files and not defined in the schema YAML. Since it's a bit tricky to calculate it I also wanted to know what the overall value of this is. If it doesn't have that much of a value I recommend to toss it and focus onpages_per_minute
instead.@kba What do you think?
That was an oversight that it's not in the schema. Why is it tricky to calculate or rather, how would you calculate pages_per_minute
without it?
processing_time
as benchmark for a page is only given in the example files and not defined in the schema YAML. Since it's a bit tricky to calculate it I also wanted to know what the overall value of this is. If it doesn't have that much of a value I recommend to toss it and focus onpages_per_minute
instead. @kba What do you think?That was an oversight that it's not in the schema. Why is it tricky to calculate or rather, how would you calculate
pages_per_minute
without it?
My first naive approach would be to look at the processing time for the complete work, calculate the mean processing time for a page and use this as basis for obtaining pages_per_minute
. The arithmetic mean for a page cannot be used for processing_time
, though, as this would imply the actual time this page took.
processing_time
as benchmark for a page is only given in the example files and not defined in the schema YAML. Since it's a bit tricky to calculate it I also wanted to know what the overall value of this is. If it doesn't have that much of a value I recommend to toss it and focus onpages_per_minute
instead. @kba What do you think?That was an oversight that it's not in the schema. Why is it tricky to calculate or rather, how would you calculate
pages_per_minute
without it?My first naive approach would be to look at the processing time for the complete work, calculate the mean processing time for a page and use this as basis for obtaining
pages_per_minute
. The arithmetic mean for a page cannot be used forprocessing_time
, though, as this would imply the actual time this page took.
pages_per_minute
is likely the more interesting measure, so feel free to focus on that.
processing_time
as benchmark for a page is only given in the example files and not defined in the schema YAML. Since it's a bit tricky to calculate it I also wanted to know what the overall value of this is. If it doesn't have that much of a value I recommend to toss it and focus onpages_per_minute
instead. @kba What do you think?That was an oversight that it's not in the schema. Why is it tricky to calculate or rather, how would you calculate
pages_per_minute
without it?My first naive approach would be to look at the processing time for the complete work, calculate the mean processing time for a page and use this as basis for obtaining
pages_per_minute
. The arithmetic mean for a page cannot be used forprocessing_time
, though, as this would imply the actual time this page took.
pages_per_minute
is likely the more interesting measure, so feel free to focus on that.
Let's skip processing_time
for pages then for now. I'll make an issue so that we can implement it in a later stage.
Sry, I accidentally rebased instead of merging, but it is all in master now.
Sry, I accidentally rebased instead of merging, but it is all in master now.
Alright, thank you!
I'll remove the branch then.
Just the (still evolving) schema, so #225 can focus on the spec itself.