Closed ocefpaf closed 7 years ago
@ocefpaf This looks great, but I won't be able to go through this thoroughly today, since I'm working on another project. Thanks.
There is no hurry. Don't switch context on account of this PR. (I know how disturbing that can be!)
@ocefpaf Okay, I have reviewed the README, all looks good see my comments above and let me know what you think. Thanks.
Awesome! Thanks @ocefpaf 😸
Thanks, guys! Looks good. I'll review and improve it further once we get very close to a new release; or possibly after releasing ...
@lsetiawan I removed the
readme.txt
because most of the information there was either redundant or outdated. Note that theREADME.md
looks "scrambled", that is because I added a few breaks to avoid long lines and make it easier to review changes in the future. (The usual rule of thumb is to break after a,
or.
.)