When I see a lot of OGMS-based ontologies, I see lots of shadow classes created.
For example
neurological disease has material basis neurological disorder
heart disease has material basis heart disorder
is this considered good practice? what are best practices for naming explicit shadow classes? what is a good exemplar ontology here?
(this shadow class problem persists with other branches, I often see X disease, X diagnosis, X disorder, X process, .... but for the purposes of this issue I am interested in disease and disorder branches)
When I see a lot of OGMS-based ontologies, I see lots of shadow classes created.
For example
is this considered good practice? what are best practices for naming explicit shadow classes? what is a good exemplar ontology here?
(this shadow class problem persists with other branches, I often see X disease, X diagnosis, X disorder, X process, .... but for the purposes of this issue I am interested in disease and disorder branches)