Closed aguynamedryan closed 8 years ago
+1 to breaking Python 2.x support. I believe there was also a comment from pycon this year about 2.x holding the community back.
Every linux system has 2.7 installed, and now the code is all 2.7. By default 3.X is not installed in many Linux releases, which would force someone to have administrative privileges or compile Python 3.X from scratch. I'd say leave it as is. I don't even see 3.X as a nice-to-have.
Barring a volunteer who wants to fork the code and maintain a python 3.0 branch, I'm going to close out this issue.
The original ETL was written with a few lines of code that only run under Python 2.x (mostly print statements that should be eliminated in #8).
In my mind, the ETL should be running under Python 3.x, seeing as 3.x has gained relatively widespread adoption at this point and I don't believe there are any library-dependencies that require us to stick with 2.x