OHDSI / OMOP-Standardized-Vocabularies

This repository is not longer active. It used to have the only purpose of creating releases of the Standardized Vocabularies, i.e. the content, not those of the Pallas Vocabulary Build System itself. As of 17-July-2018, vocabulary releases are also processed by Pallas. Please visit https://github.com/OHDSI/Vocabulary-v5.0/releases.
13 stars 6 forks source link

Vocabulary Concepts with no Equivalent Standard Concept #44

Closed noahgengel closed 4 years ago

noahgengel commented 5 years ago

Hello,

After some investigation, Zoey and I (both from CUMC) found that many sites struggled to map some of their local concepts to 'standard' concepts because no equivalent exists in the standard vocabulary. To document these gaps in the language, we wanted to list the nonstandard concepts that have no corresponding standard mapping:

ICD10/ICD10CM: R76.8: Other specified abnormal immunological findings in serum R78.9: Finding of unspecified substance, not normally found in blood R74.8: Abnormal levels of other serum enzymes R74.9: Abnormal serum enzyme level, unspecified R76.9: Abnormal immunological finding in serum unspecified R77.8: Other specified abnormalities of plasma proteins (NOTE: we found standard concepts that were unidirectional. In other words, we found a measurement for 'low' plasma proteins but not 'high' or 'general abnormal' plasma proteins). R77.9: Abnormality of plasma protein, unspecified Z51.81: THERAPEUTIC DRUG LEVEL MONITOR R97.8: Other abnormal tumor markers R77.0: Abnormality of albumin (NOTE: there are some standard concepts relating to albumin abnormalities but these are too specific) Z68.54: BMI PEDIATRIC GREAT THAN OR EQUAL TO 95% FOR AGE Z6851: BMI PEDIATRIC, LESS THAN 5TH PERCENTILE FOR AGE Z72.61: Antibody Response Examination V72.32: Encounter for Papanicolaou cervical smear to confirm findings of recent normal smear following initial abnormal smear Z13.79: ECT FOR OT SCREEN FOR GENETC&CHROMSOML ANOMALITY R77.1: Abnormality of Globulin (NOTE: there are specific abnormalities listed as standard concepts) V72.63: Pre-Procedural Laboratory Examination V72.62:LABORATORY EXAMINATION ORDERED AS PART OF A ROUTINE GENERAL MEDICAL EXAMINATION Z0283: ENCOUNTER FOR BLOOD-ALCOHOL AND BLOOD-DRUG TEST (NOTE: we have been normally classifying 'encounters' as procedures rather than measurements) Z0182:ENCOUNTER FOR ALLERGY TESTING Z0142:ECT FOR CERV SMR - CNFRM NORM SMR FOL INI AB Z0184:ENCOUNTER FOR ANTIBODY RESPONSE EXAMINATION

ICD9/ICD9CM: 790.6: OTHER ABNORMAL BLOOD CHEMISTRY 795.79: Other and unspecified nonspecific immunological findings 790.5: Other nonspecific abnormal serum enzyme levels 792.9: OTHER NONSPECIFIC ABNORMAL FINDINGS IN BODY 794.2: NONSPECIFIC ABNORMAL RESULTS OF PULMONARY FUNCTION STUDY 796.0: NONSPECIFIC ABNORMAL TOXICOLOGICAL FINDINGS 795.08: UNSATISFACTORY CERVICAL CYTOLOGY SMEAR 791.7: OTHER CELLS AND CASTS IN URINE

Local Vocabulary (not on Athena):

We recognize that this is a long list and that not all of these codes will warrant the creation of a new standard concept but thought it would not hurt to document everything we saw here. We also recognize that some of these codes technically have standard concepts in Athena but, after inspection, realized that the 'standard' mapping leaves out crucial information (e.g. going from abnormal findings to a general measurement.)

Please let either of us know if you have any questions or concerns.

Thank you, Noah Engel

cgreich commented 5 years ago

@noahgengel:

Yeah. There are a few problems with them:

Your Local codes just need to be mapped:

Hope this helps. Keep it coming. BTW: The Forum is probably the better place for this generic debate.

noahgengel commented 5 years ago

@cgreich Thank you! As a follow-up question:

Generally speaking, can we map to a panel? For example, for the CD4/8 code you suggested, what would the value truly represent? Since you said that a measurement can only have one value, how would we be able to differentiate the CD4 and CD8 values in the CD4/8 standard panel?

Thank you for all of your help, Noah

cgreich commented 5 years ago

No. You need to resolve the panel into individual Measurement to provide the results.