OHDSI / Themis

Repository for OMOP CDM conventions as defined by THEMIS. These can be reference lists of concepts, pieces of standardized code for data generation or quality certification, and debates.
Apache License 2.0
27 stars 8 forks source link

What should be done with patient reported drugs or conditions #174

Closed jiawei-qian closed 5 months ago

jiawei-qian commented 5 months ago

What should be done with patient reported drugs or conditions

CDM or THEMIS convention?

THEMIS

Table or Field level?

Field

Is this a general convention?

No

Summary of issues

  1. What should be done with patient reported drugs or conditions?

Summary of answer

  1. Eric Voss: RECOMMENDATION Patient reported data recommendation should land in the appropriate domain table (e.g. if a patient reports they had lymphoma it should land in the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE table. These data should be strongly typed so that it easily known which records are patient reported. Use type 32865-"Patient self-report" to identify these records.

NEXT STEPS Add into Conventions: https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/dataModelConventions.html#Data_Model_Conventions

Related links

OHDSI Forum (Patient-Reported Drugs and Conditions): https://forums.ohdsi.org/t/patient-reported-drugs-and-conditions/3152/28 Themis GitHub: https://github.com/OHDSI/Themis/issues/25 ATHENA link: https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Type+Concept&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=patient

Other comments/notes

  1. In the OHDSI Forum post, Clair agreed with Erica's recommendation. And gave one example. Image @clairblacketer , I am not sure for patient reported history of disease. Whether we need to also create concept 35610328 for “B-cell Hodgkin Lymphoma” in CONDITION_OCCURRENCE table? Maybe we need to make sure if the patient still has this disease when he reports the disease. If not, we can only create a record in OBSERVATION table for concept 43021273 (“History of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma”).

  2. In the THEMIS issue https://github.com/OHDSI/Themis/issues/25, Melanie gave a link for patient reported data. https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Type+Concept&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=patient Image @MelaniePhilofsky , When open the link, it shows 9 concepts. I guess the first one (32865: Patient self-report) is the concept we want for patient reported drugs/conditions?

clairblacketer commented 5 months ago

Thanks @jiawei-qian, since this is already an accepted Themis issue we should make sure it is in the repository.

MelaniePhilofsky commented 5 months ago

Issue # and location

For this ratified convention, the issue number given when the issue was created by GitHub. Was this a CDM issue, Themis issue, found in CDM documentation or found on the forum?

Format as follows:

Issue summary

What should be done with patient reported clinical events?

Convention type

Global

CDM table

NA

CDM field

All *_type_concept_id fields in the CDM

Links to issue discussion

Links to location of discussion on forums, CDM GitHub, Themis GitHub, etc.

Format as follows:

Provenance of data

EHR

The ratified convention

Patient reported data should be inserted into the appropriate domain table (e.g. if a patient reports they had lymphoma, it should be inserted into the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE table or if a patient reports using ibuprofen, it should be inserted into the DRUG_EXPOSURE table). Use concept_id = 32865, "Patient self-report" to identify these records.

Date of ratification/published

June 5, 2018

Downstream implications

NO

Link to DQD check

NA

Related conventions/further information

#Tags patient_reported, self_reported, home_med,

MelaniePhilofsky commented 5 months ago

Patient reported conventions are global conventions since they affect every clinical event record in the CDM. Should we have a page for all _type_concept_id rules? And each CDM _type_concept_id field links to the Themis page for the type concepts? @clairblacketer and @katy-sadowski

clairblacketer commented 5 months ago

@MelaniePhilofsky yes I think that makes the most sense since we now only have one type concept vocabulary