Closed clairblacketer closed 1 month ago
@burrowse The convention is correct for how we typically assign month at birth. I usually reserve this for kids and babies for whom we observe records during their year of birth, as you note. This is helpful for mother-child linkage algorithms, perhaps we put a note to that effect?
@burrowse The convention is correct for how we typically assign month at birth. I usually reserve this for kids and babies for whom we observe records during their year of birth, as you note. This is helpful for mother-child linkage algorithms, perhaps we put a note to that effect?
Okay, great! That makes sense to me! This was mostly making sure that we were aligned across the month_of_birth, day_of_birth and birth_datetime field in terms of how to infer a value as a convention.
How should month_of_birth be populated when it is not provided in the source data? Month of Birth is not required in the CDM, but it is a component of birth_datetime.
Table
person
month_of_birth
NA
General
Month of Birth is not required in the CDM, but it is a component of birth_datetime. For data sources that provide the precise date of birth, the day should be extracted and stored in this field. For data sources which lack this data point, but have a use case to infer the information (i.e. This is helpful for mother-child linkage algorithms), use the following heuristic:
NA
No
NA
NA
#Tags birth_date, month_of_birth
Edited to match wording of day_of_birth issue.
reopening for discussion as we may not need to give a convention for a not-required field
tagging @cgreich @MelaniePhilofsky
Issue has been resolved.
How to populate month_of_birth when it is not provided in the source
CDM or THEMIS convention?
Themis
Is this a general convention?
No
Summary of issues
Summary of answer
Related links
Other comments/notes