Closed alondhe closed 1 year ago
Hello @alondhe! The actual mapping for these ICD9CM concepts is following: | icd9cm_concept_id | icd9cm_concept_code | icd9cm_concept_name | snomed_concept_id | snomed_concept_name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
44836160 | 711.19 | Arthropathy associated with Reiter's disease and nonspecific urethritis, multiple sites | 78357 | Reactive arthritis triad | |
44836160 | 711.19 | Arthropathy associated with Reiter's disease and nonspecific urethritis, multiple sites | 4116450 | Secondary multiple arthrosis | |
44837325 | 711.89 | Arthropathy associated with other infectious and parasitic diseases, multiple sites | 76777 | Arthropathy associated with infection | |
44837325 | 711.89 | Arthropathy associated with other infectious and parasitic diseases, multiple sites | 4116450 | Secondary multiple arthrosis | |
44824491 | 711.59 | Arthropathy associated with other viral diseases, multiple sites | 77348 | Arthropathy associated with viral disease | |
44824491 | 711.59 | Arthropathy associated with other viral diseases, multiple sites | 4116450 | Secondary multiple arthrosis | |
44834967 | 711.49 | Arthropathy associated with other bacterial diseases, multiple sites | 76498 | Arthropathy associated with bacterial disease | |
44834967 | 711.49 | Arthropathy associated with other bacterial diseases, multiple sites | 4116450 | Secondary multiple arthrosis |
You are right, they all have 1-to-many mapping and sometimes mapping to more than one standard concept can look shady. We try to avoid it. However, in this case, we can't capture the whole meaning of the ICD9CM concept by only one SNOMED's (It is not clear that multiple joints are involved in the pathological process from the concepts like Arthropathy associated with ... as well as we can't show the etiology using only 4116450 Secondary multiple arthrosis concept) That is why I don't think that it needs improvement.
@alondhe I think it relates to the general problem discussed here: https://forums.ohdsi.org/t/condition-mapping-improvement-using-snomed-extension-proposal/3880
Can we close the issue?
pinging @alondhe - can we close this issue?
Hi @alondhe just checking again, can we close the issue now?
Hi, yes, you can close it. I suppose it's part of the larger need for SNOMED Extension
For these ICD9CM concept ids:
The standard concept mapping is to both of these:
We believe only the second one should be an appropriate mapping, whereas the first one is not a good fit. Can it be removed?