Grantee details position style

[kbighorse]

Description of change

Alignment and position improvements

Acceptance Criteria

How to test

Issue(s)

• closes #0

Checklist

To be completed by the submitter:

• [ ] Meets issue criteria
• [ ] Code is meaningfully tested
• [ ] Meets accessibility standards (WCAG 2.1 Levels A, AA)
• [ ] API Documentation updated
• [ ] Boundary diagram updated
• [ ] Logical Data Model updated
• [ ] Architectural Decision Records written for major infrastructure decisions

To the Reviewer

This project is using Conventional Comments to give structure and context to PR comments. Please use these labels in your comments.

• praise:
• nitpick:
• suggestion:
• issue:
• question:
• thought:
• chore:

[kbighorse]

[kbighorse]

usa-list--unstyled did the heavy lifting

[kbighorse]

@Sgtpluck no I haven't yet! stay tuned..

[kbighorse]

The only thing I would bring up is the ct-section-divider class has bottom padding, so in these changes, there's now a little additional padding in complaints detail. It looks fine to my eye, so I might hold off on removing it since that class is used elsewhere I didn't look at.