Closed abhinavv245 closed 5 months ago
Could you please clarify the problem concerning item ID '29I1'? Specifically, I need an explanation regarding the discrepancy between the provided time or timestamp and the corresponding date referenced by the TAT (P2D2H) for this item.
@abhinavv245
@shubhamdepasser In items, parent item has TAT P2D2H, context/timestamp is for 01/03, so w.r.t context, time/timestamp should be for 03/03, Like for RTO, TAT is P3DT5H, hence timestamp has a date 04/03.
Okay
@abhinavv245 We have completed V1.2 development for phase 1 and followed the instructions provided in the referenced sheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11W5SZDqG6gYUU5Tel1gMJqxksipbh2fQYH5_W_SU14c/edit#gid=6221937). Could you suggest the appropriate steps to resolve the identified bugs? I am concerned that solely relying on the sheet might result in encountering the same issues again.
@shubhamdepasser - can you please flag the points in which you have confusion? Phase 1 features are mandatory as per the roll out plan. The majority of the identified issues pertain to discrepancies, while a couple of them suggest features that other network participants have enabled and could enhance communication, however not obligatory.
/on_search
/on_status
/on_cancel
/on_status
@shubhamdepasser
/on_search:
/on_confirm:
/on_status:
Pls also share logs for cancel initiated by logistics buyer for fulfillment TAT breach;
@shubhamdepasser
/on_search:
/on_status_pending:
@shubhamdepasser:
@BLR-0118 Thank you for your valuable feedback. I assure you that I will immediately incorporate your inputs and keep you informed updates.
@BLR-0118 All problems have been resolved.
clearing logs for v1..2.0
Delivered Flow
/on_search
/on_confirm
/on_update
/on_status
RTO Flow
/on_cancel
/on_status
@shubhamdepasser