Open sandeepshahi opened 1 year ago
inc_search
/select
Catalog
/on_select
@wemakshaychavan
inc_search
/select
inc_on_search
/on_search
/on_select
/on_init
/on_confirm
@wemakshaychavan
on_select
delivery tat is same as time_to_ship because this merchant is doing self delivery therefore its time to ship and delivery tat will be same
@bluecypher
@bluecypher in on_select regarding oos whats the issue i am unable to understand.
@shubhamuengage
/search
/confirm
/update
/cancel
/on_search
/on_select
/on_init
/on_confirm
/on_status
/on_update
/on_cancel
@wemakshaychavan
/on_search
/select
/on_init
/track
/select1
/on_update
@wemakshaychavan
RET10 logs:
@wemakshaychavan - pls check the above
RET12 logs:
@wemakshaychavan
@wemakshaychavan - pls check above for RET11
@wemakshaychavan - pls see comment for RET13 above
@wemakshaychavan - as discussed today morning, pls respond to issues raised above for RET10/11/12
RET:10
Flow 1 /on_search
values of colour attributes are invalid (either empty values or hex value without "#"); variant groups are defined based on the size and colour attributes. How is the catalog processed? - Adding this as a validation where we do not get color with # then will send NACK. context/city STD code mismatches with store's area_code - Fixed Flow 2 /select
city/code must map with the delivery location (/fulfillments/end/location) - Fixed /on_init
invalid settlement terms (settlement_basis, settlement_window, withholding_amount ) provided; should be provided by collector (BNP here) /track inprogress
tracking is set as false and no tracking info is provided in /on_status; Flow 3 /select1 seller had updated qty during log generation
items out of stock should not be allowed to be selected again Flow 6 /on_update fixed
invalid schema; quote/price should be in string format; BNP must respond with a NACK
RET:11
Flow 5 /on_cancel* is invalid (communicated to Uengage); are we NACK'ing this? We are sending NACK Flow 6 /update is invalid - for make-to-order items, you need to send the item & customization(s) in same return request; Please share the valid sample request for the same @BLR-0118 Are we enforcing min/max for nested customizations e.g. in flow 2, customization 2455698/2455705 have nested customization groups 128078 / 128074 / 128075 / 128076 / 128068 - min is 0 for all (flow 2 is thus ok), but if min is 1 for one or more of these, are we forcing buyer to select the min no of customizations? Yes
RET12:
quote.price.value should be string (strange that's wrong only here); Fixed quote entries are incorrect: quote.price.value should be "4000", quote.breakup[] has 2 entries for item "7803924_L" for qty 2 & 1 (not sure why the qty 1 entry is here as that was part cancelled earlier); Adding this as a part of validation
Full Catalog Pull
/on_search
Incremental Pull
/search
/on_search (store closed temporarily)
/select
/on_select
/init
/confirm
/on_confirm
@wemakshaychavan