ONDC-Official / v1.2.0-logs

Retail and Logistics Logs for 1.2.0
9 stars 248 forks source link

Cosmos (SA: RET10) - Compliance check #2253

Closed Jagannath-wits closed 3 weeks ago

Jagannath-wits commented 1 month ago

Flow 1

On_search

Inc_on_search


Flow 2

on_select

on_init

confirm

on_confirm

on_status_pending

on_status_packed

on_status_picked

on_status_out_for_delivery

on_status_delivered


Flow 3

select_out_of_stock


Flow 4

on_cancel


Flow 5 - Please run the utility for each flow once before submission


Flow 6

on_update_part_cancel

update_settlement_part_cancel

on_status_pending

on_update_interim_liquidated

on_update_liquidated

update_settlement_liquidated

Will you only be supporting liquidation and not reverse-qc ?

@vijendrapatidar

sandeepshahi commented 1 month ago

Flow 1

/on_search

/on_search (inc)

Flow 2

/on_select

/on_init

/on_confirm

/on_status

Flow 4

/on_cancel

Flow 5

/on_cancel

/on_status (rto)

Flow 6

/on_update (part cancel)

/on_status

/on_update (liquidated)

@vijendrapatidar

vijendrakiko commented 1 month ago

Hi @sandeepshahi Please review this PR https://github.com/ONDC-Official/v1.2.0-logs/pull/2262

sandeepshahi commented 3 weeks ago

Flow 1

/on_search

/on_search (inc)

Flow 2

/on_select

/on_init

/on_confirm

Flow 4

/on_cancel

Flow 5

/on_cancel

/on_status (rto)

Flow 6

/on_status

@vijendrakiko

Gururaj-KikoLive commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @sandeepshahi Please check new PR as discussed we've made changes and resubmitted https://github.com/ONDC-Official/v1.2.0-logs/pull/2282

sandeepshahi commented 3 weeks ago

Flow 1

/on_search

/on_search (inc)

/on_status (Pending)

Flow 5

/on_cancel

/on_status (rto)

@Gururaj-KikoLive @vijendrakiko

Gururaj-KikoLive commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @sandeepshahi We've done the changes in our code please check for flow 1 for flow 5 we're sending in half n hour

Gururaj-KikoLive commented 3 weeks ago

https://github.com/ONDC-Official/v1.2.0-logs/pull/2285

@sandeepshahi Please check flow 1 & 5 updated

sandeepshahi commented 3 weeks ago

Flow 1

/on_search (inc)

Flow 5

/on_status (Pending)

@vijendrakiko @Gururaj-KikoLive

vijendrapatidar commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks @sandeep Sure We will send in some time.

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:28 AM Sandeep Shahi @.***> wrote:

Flow 1

/on_search (inc)

  • please share the screenshot of seller panel for all the incremental refresh scenarios
  • store close
    • start time of store closure is required in /time/range
  • store reopen
    • store must be reopened using label = "open"

Flow 5

/on_status (Pending)

  • estimated time ranges should be future dated; check start/time/range/start

@vijendrakiko https://github.com/vijendrakiko @Gururaj-KikoLive https://github.com/Gururaj-KikoLive

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ONDC-Official/v1.2.0-logs/issues/2253#issuecomment-2303786659, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF2YA33GTZ2Z6RLTSZF2ZX3ZSVVXTAVCNFSM6AAAAABMO4IC3OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBTG44DMNRVHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

sandeepshahi commented 3 weeks ago

Also, @vijendrakiko, have you implemented the catalog rejection framework feature?

Gururaj-KikoLive commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @sandeepshahi for /on_status (Pending)

estimated time ranges should be future dated; check start/time/range/start - Start time range start should we use of context timestamp?

Gururaj-KikoLive commented 3 weeks ago

@sandeepshahi Yes catalogue rejection framework is implemented

vijendrapatidar commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @sandeep Please check this PR and Screen shot for store and item update functionality

https://github.com/ONDC-Official/v1.2.0-logs/pull/2287

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:04 AM Gururaj-KikoLive @.***> wrote:

@sandeepshahi https://github.com/sandeepshahi Yes catalogue rejection framework is implemented

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ONDC-Official/v1.2.0-logs/issues/2253#issuecomment-2303821686, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF2YA375IEO2RTMHU67HC7DZSVZ73AVCNFSM6AAAAABMO4IC3OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBTHAZDCNRYGY . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

sandeepshahi commented 3 weeks ago

@vijendrakiko, how can disabled store be closed later? Please check the sequence of the incremental catalogs and disable the other button in the UI accordingly.

vijendrakiko commented 3 weeks ago

Okay, we will do it now on the UI side.

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 at 16:25, Sandeep Shahi @.***> wrote:

@vijendrakiko https://github.com/vijendrakiko, how can disabled store be closed later? Please check the sequence of the incremental catalogs and disable the other button in the UI accordingly.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ONDC-Official/v1.2.0-logs/issues/2253#issuecomment-2304372520, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2LG2D52OQAKZEYWQFJCISTZSW7SHAVCNFSM6AAAAABMO4IC3OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBUGM3TENJSGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

Gururaj-KikoLive commented 3 weeks ago

@sandeepshahi Are there any additional requirements from your end? Please share them all at once so that we can prepare and respond accordingly. Addressing each point individually is causing significant delays. If we had known that video and screenshots were required during the initial review, we could have arranged for them simultaneously, which would have prevented unnecessary delays in the process.

sandeepshahi commented 3 weeks ago

@Gururaj-KikoLive, the only requirement is to provide the logs unaltered and as-is.

A video demo was requested in the last meeting as well. Additionally, since there were concerns that the screenshots might appear altered, we have asked for the video. Please address all the issues and ensure everything is thoroughly checked before submitting. This will help avoid any unnecessary back-and-forth. If the video demo takes some time, it might indicate that the requested features still need to be implemented.

Gururaj-KikoLive commented 3 weeks ago

Yes @sandeepshahi Our main goal is to address all identified and doubtful concerns all at once. We used a utility tool to clear the logs, and there were also some requested changes that were later reverted. It will just lead to a never-ending process for both of us, and neither of us will benefit from this. Our logs had flaws which we solved and resubmitted, but we are only concerned about newly arising requests and issues.

Gururaj-KikoLive commented 3 weeks ago

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YZQ4Tqf3X5oD7mLXo-yRhhdBq82SJMx1?usp=sharing

@sandeepshahi Please check above videos,

sandeepshahi commented 3 weeks ago

Logs approved for v1.2.0

@Gururaj-KikoLive @vijendrakiko

vijendrapatidar commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks @sandeep

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 at 5:48 PM, Sandeep Shahi @.***> wrote:

Logs approved for v1.2.0

@Gururaj-KikoLive https://github.com/Gururaj-KikoLive @vijendrakiko https://github.com/vijendrakiko

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ONDC-Official/v1.2.0-logs/issues/2253#issuecomment-2304528288, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF2YA34LCOZ34WOMVCZOTKDZSXJI7AVCNFSM6AAAAABMO4IC3OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBUGUZDQMRYHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>