Closed jm-rivera closed 2 years ago
70% of the numbers are the same, 8 are only available from WB (generally wealthier countries). The mean absolute difference (for non-equal values) is 1.3pp, the median 1.05, the max is 4.7pp
Recommendation: use WFP data enhanced by WB only in cases where it is missing.
70% of the numbers are the same, 7 are only available from WB (generally wealthier countries). The mean absolute difference (for non-equal values) is 2.5pp, the median 2.1, the max is 7.2pp
Recommendation: use WFP data enhanced by WB only in cases where it is missing.
Leaving open for a decision on which data to use for product.
I'd prefer to use wasting - as a more generalised indicator of poor nutrition across populations - if the data stands up to it. Thanks
Closing on the assumption that we'll move forward with wasting, as described.
Add functions to download and store:
Prevalence of Stunting, measured by height for age (modeled estimate, % of children under 5) https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.WAST.ZS
Prevalence of Wasting https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.WAST.ZS
Compare coverage and latest data to that available from WFP. Report back in comments