Open madscientist159 opened 4 years ago
Yeah, you seems about right, since we do not have any ppc64le
processor at our reach
And seems this is not very popular architecture, so I don't think we have enough manpower to add support of it
I'll leave this issue open, but I don't think there will be any changes any time soon
FWIW, it's growing in popularity pretty quickly, especially on desktop. It's one of the only open ISAs, and the only one to have server, desktop, and even embedded class CPUs on the market today. See e.g. https://twitter.com/runlevel__5/status/1255287674707087361 and https://twitter.com/carlosedp/status/1255275941544243202 for examples of people using POWER machines as their daily drivers and / or for software development work.
I'm working on adding support -- so far no major roadblocks have been encountered on the server build aside from the usual Google build tooling problems. If I put together a patch series to enable the server component build on POWER, would that be acceptable into mainline?
Initial patch series at https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/build_tools/pull/85
Tested to build if the patches in patches/linux/
are applied to their respective main source trees.
These patches are confirmed to work properly in conjunction with NextCloud on a Debian ppc64le host.
Any chance we can get a review / merge on the patches?
@madscientist159 I left a comment on PR yesterday
@ShockwaveNN Sorry, didn't get an Email from Github for some reason. Will get it fixed up.
Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
Report a bug
What is the current behavior?
When compiling on a ppc64le system, ONLYOFFICE tries to build for 32-bit Linux. This is wrong and leads to a build failure.
If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem.
What is the expected behavior?
Build for 64-bit Linux
DocumentServer version:
Latest GIT master
Operating System:
Debian Buster