Inplace cosserat stress

mvanzulli commented 1 year ago

Closes #437

Main

"uniaxial_extension" => 5-element BenchmarkTools.BenchmarkGroup:
    "solve, ms = 0.3, nelems = 580, nnodes = 201" => Trial(16.441 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.1, nelems = 9292, nnodes = 2147" => Trial(300.951 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.2, nelems = 1343, nnodes = 400" => Trial(39.159 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.5, nelems = 144, nnodes = 62" => Trial(3.747 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.4, nelems = 256, nnodes = 107" => Trial(7.018 ms)
"uniaxial_compression" => 5-element BenchmarkTools.BenchmarkGroup:
    "solve, ms = 0.3, nelems = 580, nnodes = 201" => Trial(14.801 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.1, nelems = 9292, nnodes = 2147" => Trial(281.064 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.2, nelems = 1343, nnodes = 400" => Trial(35.352 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.5, nelems = 144, nnodes = 62" => Trial(3.412 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.4, nelems = 256, nnodes = 107" => Trial(6.384 ms)

This branch

"uniaxial_extension" => 5-element BenchmarkTools.BenchmarkGroup:
    tags: []
    "solve, ms = 0.3, nelems = 580, nnodes = 201" => Trial(16.355 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.1, nelems = 9292, nnodes = 2147" => Trial(294.047 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.2, nelems = 1343, nnodes = 400" => Trial(38.229 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.5, nelems = 144, nnodes = 62" => Trial(3.793 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.4, nelems = 256, nnodes = 107" => Trial(7.040 ms)
"uniaxial_compression" => 5-element BenchmarkTools.BenchmarkGroup:
    tags: []
    "solve, ms = 0.3, nelems = 580, nnodes = 201" => Trial(14.415 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.1, nelems = 9292, nnodes = 2147" => Trial(275.075 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.2, nelems = 1343, nnodes = 400" => Trial(34.459 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.5, nelems = 144, nnodes = 62" => Trial(3.317 ms)
    "solve, ms = 0.4, nelems = 256, nnodes = 107" => Trial(6.192 ms)

codecov-commenter commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Merging #442 (d604f2e) into main (9fd583c) will increase coverage by 0.03%. The diff coverage is 98.14%.

:exclamation: Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #442      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.83%   86.87%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          43       43              
  Lines        1679     1684       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         1458     1463       +5     
  Misses        221      221

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/Materials/HyperElasticMaterials.jl	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
src/Materials/LinearElasticMaterials.jl	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
src/Entities/Tetrahedrons.jl	`98.42% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/Entities/Trusses.jl	`98.80% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/Materials/HyperElasticMaterial.jl	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/Materials/NeoHookeanMaterial.jl	`89.79% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/Materials/SVKMaterial.jl	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/StructuralAnalyses/StaticStates.jl	`87.80% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/StructuralAnalyses/StructuralAnalyses.jl	`81.25% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/Utils.jl	`96.00% <100.00%> (+1.88%)`	:arrow_up:

:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

mforets commented 1 year ago

fine with the changes, but the result is not noticeable on such bench, right?

did you compare the allocs as well?

mvanzulli commented 1 year ago

fine with the changes, but the result is not noticeable on such bench, right?

did you compare the allocs as well?

Yes, however there are not noticeable differences in allocations. Tenosors.jl does not provide an in-place operation computing the derivatives via Automatic Differentiation

ONSAS / ONSAS.jl