XML Transformation Issues with BT-127-notice and BT-728-Procedure Fields After SDK Version 1.12 Update

[skyazid]

Hello,

Since the update to version 1.12, I have been experiencing difficulties with the XML transformation of the BT-127-notice and BT-728-Procedure fields.

Context

After analyzing this commit: https://github.com/OP-TED/eForms-SDK/commit/315a03acaeecc5eb3b064f997cfbeed6bee410db, I noticed two changes that seem to prevent the correct generation of XML files.

Identified Issues

1. BT-127-notice:

   A nodeId "ND-ProcedureProcurementScope" was added to the "GR-Procedure-Description" level. If I remove this nodeId (as in SDK version 1.11), the XML generation works correctly.

2. BT-728-Procedure:

   "GR-Procedure-PlaceOfPerformance" underwent a nodeId change. Previously, it was "ND-ProcedurePlacePerformanceAdditionalInformation," but now it has been replaced by "ND-ProcedurePlacePerformance." This change seems inconsistent to me because, according to the fields.json file, BT-728-Procedure has a parentNodeID = "ND-ProcedurePlacePerformanceAdditionalInformation."

I have noticed these inconsistencies across all subTypes:

{
  1=[BT-728-Procedure],
  2=[BT-728-Procedure],
  3=[BT-728-Procedure],
  4=[BT-728-Procedure, BT-127-notice],
  5=[BT-728-Procedure, BT-127-notice],
  6=[BT-728-Procedure, BT-127-notice],
  7=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, BT-127-notice, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  8=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, BT-127-notice, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  9=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, BT-127-notice, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  10=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  11=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  12=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  13=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  14=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  15=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  16=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  17=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  18=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  19=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  20=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  21=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  22=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  23=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  24=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-EUFunds, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  25=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  26=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  27=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  28=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  29=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  30=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  31=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  32=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  33=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  34=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  35=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  36=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  37=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  38=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  39=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance], 
  40=[BT-728-Procedure, GR-Lot-PlaceOfPerformance],
  .....
}

Code Used

I am using the XML generation code from the following branch: https://github.com/OP-TED/eforms-notice-editor/tree/feature/TEDEFO-2456-use-of-fields-attribute-information

Could you please clarify these changes and explain how to ensure the correct XML generation for these fields?

Thank you in advance for your help.

@rouschr @bertrand-lorentz

[YvesJo]

Hi, The group association shouldn't have changed and it should remain associated to ND-ProcedurePlacePerformanceAdditionalInformation,. We will fix this in a next release KR

[skyazid]

Hi @YvesJo,

Thank you for the clarification regarding the BT-728-Procedure.

However, I would also like some clarification on the BT-127-notice. As mentioned above, adding the nodeId "ND-ProcedureProcurementScope" to "GR-Procedure-Description" prevents the XML from being generated correctly. If I remove this nodeId (as was the case in SDK version 1.11), the XML generation works correctly. Could you clarify whether this is a bug as well?

Additionally, could you provide an estimated release date for the fix? Will it be addressed in a 1.12.1 update?

Thanks again for your help.

[encampaen]

Hello, BT-127-Notice will be assigned to a separate display group within the procedure section for the affected subtypes in a future release.