Closed idolum closed 2 years ago
@costezki Finished the description of this issue.
@costezki We discussed this this week in CEN/TC 440/WG 5. From our point of view, the quantities on the relationships are relevant. Some example from experts in WG 5
In favor of constistency, we prefer the quantities on all of the relationship. The same is done by Peppol.
Proliferate sub-classes of item relationships to cover all item relations.
Classes were be added.
As part of a description of an item in catalogue, the relationship between items has to be described. Relevant relationships between items:
Proposal for extending the ontology:
Proposed definitions: