Open andreea-pasare opened 2 years ago
Will handle this when it will be decided what's the proper alignment methodology to be used between ePO and Core Vocabularies.
locn:adminUnitL1 and locn:adminUnitL2 were added in order to be aligned with core-location vocabulary. However they seem to be the literal alternative option for epo:hasNutsCode and epo:hasCountryCode, which are relations to controled lists.
We need to decide on whether locn:adminUnitL1 and locn:adminUnitL2 should be removed in ePO 5.0.0.
See details in the following issue: https://github.com/OP-TED/ted-rdf-mapping/issues/95