Closed csnyulas closed 1 year ago
This is again brought up in: https://github.com/OP-TED/ted-rdf-mapping/issues/289
The generalisation statement between a role and its type (AcquiringParty, SellerParty or AuxiliaryParty) should not be present in the technical mapping. This will be inferred from ePO.
We received this feedback on the mapping of forms F06 from @muricna :
It is not clear how ePO supports the representation of various levels of Agent in Role. I opened this ticket so that it can be further discussed in the EPO WG meetings.
PS: This is the relevant generated RDF output: https://github.com/OP-TED/ted-rdf-mapping/blob/release/tx1.2/mappings/package_F06/output/231436-2021/231436-2021.ttl