search

OP-TED / ted-rdf-mapping-eforms

TED-RDF Mapping Suites for eForms Notices
European Union Public License 1.2
1 stars 0 forks source link

On suggestion to use `ext:concerns` vs. `rdfs:seeAlso` #51

Open schivmeister opened 2 months ago

schivmeister commented 2 months ago

For the node ND-StrategicProcurementInformationLotResult we received the following feedback:

The Node is about Strategic procurement not just green procurement threfore the rdfs: see Also should be between LotResult and Strategic Procuement instead of rdfs: seeAlso we suggest using ext: concerns Strategic Prourement

We assume there is a suggestion to use a certain predicate ext:concerns in place of rdfs:seeAlso. However, that is arbitrary, non-standard and undocumented.

The initial suggestion of rdfs:seeAlso was brought up by @cristianvasquez and @csnyulas as it is built into the RDF-S vocabulary, so it has a sound basis.

We would like to know if this suggestion would still be considered valid, given the above.

cristianvasquez commented 1 month ago

hello @csnyulas, what is this ext: prefix? Do you happen to have any more information?

It makes sense to use these temporary predicates if properly documented. The documentation can be a SHACL document, in line with https://github.com/OP-TED/ted-rdf-mapping-eforms/issues/33.

schivmeister commented 1 month ago

We have no idea. It was mentioned in the feedback, quoted above. We were asked to file a ticket asking for clarification.