OP-TED ted-rdf-mapping-eforms issues

OP-TED / ted-rdf-mapping-eforms

TED-RDF Mapping Suites for eForms Notices

European Union Public License 1.2

1 stars 0 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Metadata in package_cn_v1.9 tag:1.0.0-rc.2

#27 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
1
Document RML requirements, URI scheme

#26 schivmeister closed 5 months ago
0
epo:AwardCriterion properties

#25 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
0
epo:FrameworkAgreementTerm missing epo:hasFrameworkAgreementType

#24 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
0
epo:AgentInRole missing epo:playedBy --> [1..1] foaf:Agent

#23 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
1
Question on URIs ending

#22 OceaneAbrard closed 5 months ago
6
Allow capturing of datatype violations in modified SHACL that suppresses them

#20 schivmeister closed 5 months ago
2
multiple locn:fullAddress

#19 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
1
Testing SHACL with inherited properties

#18 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
4
Lot epo:hasAmountValue

#17 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
1
epo:hasPrizeRank should have one value

#16 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
0
Contact point contains an Identifier

#15 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
1
hasMinimumNumberOfCandidates value should be integer

#14 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
3
use EAuctionTechnique instead of EAuctionTechniqueUsage

#13 cristianvasquez closed 5 months ago
0
Feedback on "missing" fields: `BT-781-Lot` (Duration Additional Information)

#12 csnyulas opened 6 months ago
0
Mapping of `ND-Participants` and `BT-47-Lot`

#11 csnyulas opened 6 months ago
0
Feedback on `ND-ChangeReason`

#10 csnyulas opened 6 months ago
0
Feedback on `ND-LotValueEstimateExtension` node (and related `BT-271-Lot` field)

#9 csnyulas opened 6 months ago
0
`xsd:date` vs. `xsd:dateTime` in the mapping of fields `BT-536-Lot`, `BT-537-Lot`, `BT-78-Lot`, `BT-719-notice`, `BT-1451-Contract`

#8 csnyulas opened 6 months ago
5
What is the meaning of fields `BT-768-Contract` and `OPT-100-Contract` and what is the relationship between them?

#7 csnyulas opened 7 months ago
1
Mapping of fields not mentioned in subtype specific JSON files

#6 csnyulas closed 6 months ago
2
Clarification needed regarding the mapping of `ND-Lot` (Question 5)

#5 csnyulas closed 4 months ago
6
Clarification needed regarding the mapping of `OPT-030-Procedure-SProvider` (Question 4)

#4 csnyulas closed 4 months ago
4
Clarification needed regarding the mapping of `BT-271-LotsGroup` (Question 3)

#3 csnyulas closed 9 months ago
2
Clarification needed regarding the mapping of `OPT-090-Lot` (Question 2)

#2 csnyulas closed 9 months ago
9
Clarification needed regarding the mapping of `BT-06-Lot` (Question 1)

#1 csnyulas closed 4 months ago
5