reuse the identity policy in the reconnect that has been used in the connect

[KircMax]

Proposed changes

Describe the changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.

Related Issues

• Fixes #2525

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR.

• [x] Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [ ] Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [ ] Test enhancement (non-breaking change to increase test coverage)
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected, requires version increase of Nuget packages)
• [ ] Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

• [x] I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc.
• [x] I have signed the CLA.
• [x] I ran tests locally with my changes, all passed.
• [ ] I fixed all failing tests in the CI pipelines.
• [ ] I fixed all introduced issues with CodeQL and LGTM.
• [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage.
• [ ] I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate).
• [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

[KircMax]

I also added passing the cancellationtoken to the factory method but I can also undo it if you want - just noticed that the cancellationtoken exists and is not passed.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (2b9d8f9) 53.81% compared to head (85aac28) 46.52%. Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2526 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 53.81% 46.52% -7.30% ========================================== Files 334 284 -50 Lines 64409 58025 -6384 Branches 13235 11852 -1383 ========================================== - Hits 34663 26994 -7669 - Misses 25990 27829 +1839 + Partials 3756 3202 -554 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mregen]

@mrsuciu had been looking into policyId issues recently, please code review as well.