I have test the KITTI-MOT 0006 Reconstruction config. The depth estimation is similar with the Wandb log provided. The estimated depth is different from the mono depth.
Thanks for your quick replay. I think utilize the sky weight on depth loss calculation is a good idea.
By the way, I have two more questions:
Does it reasonable to select rays from different images to calculate mono loss? Different image mono depth esitimate might have different scale and shift.
I notice that scale_factor is set to 0.1. Also while calculate monosdf_depth_loss, a scale and shift is applied on termination_depth. Does it necessary?
I have test the KITTI-MOT 0006 Reconstruction config. The depth estimation is similar with the Wandb log provided. The estimated depth is different from the mono depth.![depth](https://github.com/OPEN-AIR-SUN/mars/assets/70940473/4d38f673-67d3-4eeb-ad0d-4d5e79d85647)