search

OPM / opm-simulators

Simulator programs and utilities for automatic differentiation.
http://www.opm-project.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
111 stars 121 forks source link

Older release versions of OPM Flow #2176

Open fdlberylian opened 4 years ago

fdlberylian commented 4 years ago

Hi,

I am trying to compare the results from current release of Flow to its older versions (2018.10 and older). When I tried to build from source by cloning the 2018.10 branch, I got errors when "make"-ing it. I also tried downloading the 2018.10-final-release source code and got same errors when "make"-ing it. I wonder if there is a way I can get the 2018.10 release, maybe a pre-compiled version is available or something? Thanks in advance.

I also attach the error I got when building 2018.10 from source. Screenshot from 2019-11-21 14-37-25

joakim-hove commented 4 years ago

For versions prior to the latest 2019.10 version you also have to download and build the libecl library : equinor/libecl on github.com

fdlberylian commented 4 years ago

I already have libecl installed and it still won't work. Is the version of libecl (or any prerequisites) have any effect on compiling the older versions? I have libecl ver 2.2 installed.

akva2 commented 4 years ago

Yes. Use https://github.com/equinor/libecl/commits/2018.10 for 2018.10.

-------- Opprinnelig melding -------- Fra: fdlberylian notifications@github.com Dato: 21.11.2019 16:08 (GMT+01:00) Til: OPM/opm-simulators opm-simulators@noreply.github.com Ko: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Emne: Re: [OPM/opm-simulators] Older release versions of OPM Flow (#2176)

I already have libecl installed and it still won't work. Is the version of libecl (or any prerequisites) have any effect on compiling the older versions? I have libecl ver 2.2 installed.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FOPM%2Fopm-simulators%2Fissues%2F2176%3Femail_source%3Dnotifications%26email_token%3DAAQLQRYC4OKP5SDBXM7RKA3QU2P2LA5CNFSM4JQCPAH2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEE2RCUA%23issuecomment-557125968&data=02%7C01%7Carne.morten.kvarving%40sintef.no%7C20146c8793754ef827f708d76e94a56b%7Ce1f00f39604145b0b309e0210d8b32af%7C1%7C0%7C637099457012456960&sdata=TedH08m4jjz%2FUMd24ICLyr3SMKA7hs3gK6QRPC8hnVc%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAAQLQR3BWNJNCJLB2CGYDP3QU2P2LANCNFSM4JQCPAHQ&data=02%7C01%7Carne.morten.kvarving%40sintef.no%7C20146c8793754ef827f708d76e94a56b%7Ce1f00f39604145b0b309e0210d8b32af%7C1%7C0%7C637099457012466955&sdata=VFWCOK3tQptick4LJSKFCZuXFN1GS8uYhIWX45jcyQU%3D&reserved=0.

blattms commented 4 years ago

@fdlberylian Cool. If you also check serial/parallel runtime for your models, I would be very interested in the data. Hopefully you are willing to share it, e.g. here.