Closed gahansen closed 3 years ago
Just force-pushed some formatting changes suggested by Travis.
Sounds great @aprokop ! Once the commit goes in that addresses https://github.com/arborx/ArborX/issues/419, I'll update this PR. One question, should I cancel this one and re-submit the ExecutionSpace{} mods at that time, or should I just update this PR (#592) given those changes at that time?
Once the commit goes in that addresses arborx/ArborX#419, I'll update this PR
We'll first need to merge not only the PR in ArborX, but also to update ArborX in DTK.
One question, should I cancel this one and re-submit the ExecutionSpace{} mods at that time, or should I just update this PR (#592) given those changes at that time?
Just update this PR.
Just updated PR to reflect @aprokop comments above.
@gahansen Can you please rebase this PR on top of master and see if it fixes the problem?
@aprokop - I rebased the PR and made several changes to address minor changes in ArborX (DistributedTree --> DistributedSearchTree). Still see the static_assert compile error coming from the use of unmanaged views (error log attached).
@gahansen If you had to do a change to fix the DistributedSearchTree
, this means that when you updated you did not pull the latest submodules. Can you please make sure your submodule in packages/Search
is up to date?
Sorry @aprokop - submodules are new to me but I think I have done this properly now. I rebased, updated the submodules, and pushed this commit to my fork for the automated tester. These changes did fix the compile errors I was seeing on the GCC10 machine. All tests are clean with the exception of "DataTransferKit_Interpolation_MPI_4" that was noted at the beginning of the PR.
@gahansen The CI is failing now, while it was passing before. It seems that together with ArborX submodule you have also updated the TriBITS submodule. I wonder if the errors are coming from that upgrade. Could you please revert it so that you patch only contains changes to the files in DTK?
Thanks @aprokop ! I think the third time is the charm. It looks like the checks passed this time. Thanks for all your help with this, I'll know how to do it next time!
@gahansen Thanks!
I ended up having some additional compilation errors using GCC10 on RHEL7 after issue #589 was resolved. Here is a quick PR that gets the code to compile for me. I made two changes in this PR:
Address incorrect number of arguments in ArborX::minMax() and sendAcrossNetwork() calls.
Address compilation error from using Kokkos unmanaged views (hitting static_assert on line 538 of ArborX_DetailsUtils.hpp
I'm not certain that I did the correct thing here, but these changes do point at the issues that I saw so please feel free to give me feedback or do something different here.
All of the tests run for me except for:
Here are the errors I see in that test: