Closed superwhiskers closed 2 months ago
oh. this also adds comments referencing stuff about extracting L/U factors. i'll remove that so this can be focused only on testing
@superwhiskers, I suggest you add fix for #162 to this PR.
rebased on latest develop
https://github.com/ORNL/ReSolve/blob/lusol-integration-tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt#L140 - might be good to have Lusol be used in the consumer test for testing resolve~cuda~rocm~klu+lusol
https://github.com/ORNL/ReSolve/blob/lusol-integration-tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt#L140 - might be good to have Lusol be used in the consumer test for testing
resolve~cuda~rocm~klu+lusol
I agree. To get there, we need to get LUSOL to work within a refactorization solver strategy, which is outside the scope of this PR.
Closing in favor of #189.
this pull request adds a functionality test for LUSOL. there is one thing that needs to be worked out before this can actually be merged:
matrix::Coo
class which expands the matrix. this is not permanent and it should be fully expanded upon prior to a merge with equivalent functionality for other matrix types