Elaborate and merge F7, F8, F9 criterias

[janhalen]

What part needs to change?

F7  Driftskrav til løsningen er dokumenteret    
F8  Løsningen er dokumenteret på teknisk niveau     
F9  Teknisk implementering af løsningen er dokumenteret

Obstacle

These criteria can be confusing and some parts even overlapping..

Background

Propose solution

This criteria should follow the "Document the code" criteria from Foundation for Puclic Code.

References

https://standard.publiccode.net/criteria/document-the-code.html

https://dzone.com/articles/the-anatomy-of-a-great-open-source-documentation-h

[janhalen]

Add to the criteria that the way the documentation should be written somewhat along these lines: "Os2 anviser dokumentations skabelonen placeret.. -> link" "OS2 follow the documentation requirements from Foundation for Public code"

@zorp, any comments?

[janhalen]

This criteria and specifically the "how-to" document should be linked to the https://github.com/OS2offdig/os2-docs-template.

Moved to https://github.com/OS2offdig/governance_report_template/issues/36

[janhalen]

• [x] The reference to the Foundation for public code should be moved to our documentation-template repo.

@zorp - SFPC criteria now mentioned in the template README --> https://github.com/OS2offdig/os2-docs-template/blob/main/README.md

[janhalen]

Proposal:

Merge F7, F8 and F9 into a new F7 criteria: "Alt dokumentation til projektet udarbejdes med og overholder OS2s standardskabelon for dokumentation."