search

OSGeo / grass-website

Web site of GRASS GIS project (deployed from this repo twice a day)
https://grass.osgeo.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
17 stars 48 forks source link

Update Global Datasets #454

Closed baharmon closed 3 months ago

baharmon commented 3 months ago

@ecodiv @veroandreo Update the global datasets on the Data page to their latest releases (v2.0.0).

ecodiv commented 3 months ago

@veroandreo @neteler will this also update the download of the sample data from within GRASS? Or does this require a separate request in the grass gis repository?

@ecodiv @veroandreo Update the global datasets on the Data page to their latest releases (v2.0.0).

* [Basic global dataset](https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.3762773) [DOWNLOAD ZIP (121.3 MB)](https://zenodo.org/records/3762852/files/natural-earth-dataset.zip?download=1)

* [Full global dataset](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13370326) [DOWNLOAD ZIP (2.2 GB)](https://zenodo.org/records/13370326/files/global-dataset.zip?download=1)

The basic dataset URL should be https://zenodo.org/records/13370131/files/natural_earth_dataset.zip, I think?

neteler commented 3 months ago

May I suggest to better use: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3762773 ?

neteler commented 3 months ago

will this also update the download of the sample data from within GRASS? Or does this require a separate request in the grass gis repository?

As it is a separate repository, a source code related pull request is needed there. Seems you already opened it at https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/4223

baharmon commented 3 months ago

With correct links:

Basic global dataset DOWNLOAD ZIP (121.3 MB)

Full global dataset DOWNLOAD ZIP (2.2 GB)

wenzeslaus commented 3 months ago

To the topic of authors (GRASS Development Team was suggested in #4172), while I think we should make an effort to acknowledge everyone, I'm not convinced "GRASS Development Team" is helping that. It is trying to acknowledge everyone and it may end up acknowledging no one because there are no names. Another issue is providing the citation for that. While I have seen some efforts to deal with a group being an author, citations systems mostly count on individual people being authors. Having a "group author" then complicates lives of people who want to cite the dataset. And, when a "group author" does not translate well into individual names, it also does not count as a citation for anyone. I would prefer if, e.g., people involved in the issue and PR are included as authors since they were the ones forming it or even just the two people who actually dealt with the data.