Closed sebastic closed 4 years ago
Perhaps one or two of the above mentionned PDF could be referenced in the description of README.EUROPE ?
Perhaps one or two of the above mentioned PDF could be referenced in the description of README.EUROPE ?
Yes, RDNAPTRANS2018.pdf should be consulted by users, as it's the best documentation for the grids to date.
I'd rather not link to the Debian package git repo, but I guess we don't have much of a choice. grid_alternatives already does it too because the files are not easily available at the authoritative source.
@sebastic Willing to submit the corresponding PR to proj itself to register the 2 grids used by EPSG in grid_alternatives ?
Variant 1 for the horizontal transformation will not be included in EPSG.
EPSG:9282 uses rdtrans2018.gsb (variant 2) for the horizontal transformation. A disadvantage is that it can not be used outside the grid bounds. When outside the grid bounds, EPSG:9281 could be used to obtain the same results as Variant 1.
EPSG:9281 uses only a 7 parameter transformation, which gives an approximated transformation with an accuracy of 25 cm.
The old RDNAPTRANS™2008 grids for The Netherlands (
rdtrans2008.gsb
&naptrans2008.gtx
) are currently used in PROJ, but could not be included in proj-datumgrid due to a non-free license. Details available in: Use of RDTRANS2008 and NAPTRANS2008.pdfThe new RDNAPTRANS™2018 grids use the CC-BY-4.0 license, and come in two variants. Details available in: RDNAPTRANS2018.pdf
EPSG 9.8.6 now includes changes for RDNAPTRANS™2018:
rdtrans2018.gsb
(variant 2) for the horizontal transformationnlgeo2018.gtx
(variant 1) for the vertical transformation.There are still some outstanding issues which have prevented the inclusion of
rdcorr2018.gsb
(variant 1) in EPSG, but it's expected in a future EPSG update. For now the combination of variants needs to used (starting 1 October 2020 when the 2008 should no longer be used), instead of only the recommended variant 1.I'm not sure if the changes to
filelist.csv
are correct.CC: @Jochem-L