Closed jmckenna closed 4 months ago
Hi @jmckenna
I know that unfortunately we are not very high in the rank. To be honest, I am surprised that in 2024 search engines are making any difference if there is data in the description
tag that is already in the content of the page. It would be basically duplicating the text. The main information is already in the title
tag (code and name)!
About the sitemap, https://github.com/OSGeo/spatialreference.org/pull/17 is there since March
If you let me be evil, I understand that epsg dot io is better ranked: it has a lot of adds from Google. We have none. That makes our page less interesting to be visited for the adds provider... that is also the search engine. But maybe I am too suspicious.
Hi @jjimenezshaw I've found that even in 2024, doing the basics still helps. For example, I notice that we lack a robots.txt, for machines to crawl. (see how-to)
I'm also ok to close this ticket now, someday someone can come back to tackle, and re-open.
I will add a non restrictive robots.txt (2 lines) and the description
and keywords
tags... just repeating the information that is already there.
Probably it is more effective that other pages link to ours... but I have no control over that ;)
This tool is giving some insights: https://seorch.net --> URL: https://spatialreference.org/
Besides many good SEO test results there are also some issues listed. Summary:
<h1>
Tags found. (Missing heading)Thanks @neteler that is giving some useful tips. I run it in a specific CRS, and it gives slightly different (but similar) results. I think what we want to be reached per CRS, that is what people search.
What make me nuts is the "The
What make me nuts is the "The
Tag has too few words: 3." Really? Look at the title of a Google page ;)
Seorch is not my system, I was just the messenger :-)
thanks @jjimenezshaw, worth a try!
Two weeks later... do you (anybody) have any feeling of improvement? (maybe I am too optimistic expecting any change in google in two weeks)
I have made an attempt to add an intro in #26.
Still, pages like https://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3978/ are looking pretty nerdy to me. For people coming directly to this page, it may not be obvious what this is all about :-)
So, what about adding some text between
EPSG:3978
and
NAD83 / Canada Atlas Lambert
?
Update: trying the search from above again: https://www.google.com/search?q=epsg+3978
Now (at least here in Germany) this site ranks 3rd, so the situation slowly seems to improve.
Agreed, improving (2nd result here).
description
,keywords
etc (that help search engines crawl the pages)Maybe try adding a description tag first?
For comparison, view-source of https://epsg.io/3978