Closed praneethratna closed 8 months ago
@praneethratna : This looks great! I verified the file @icaro-00 and those that we already have in the test data, and confirmed that even if receiver_sampling_frequency
exists it could be 0, which is a case we haven't seen previously. Before we have only seen files that do not contain this field altogether, from earlier versions of the EK80 software.
Please feel free to merge! Thanks!
BTW, @icaro-00 : Do you have a file that is much smaller that we could include in our test data set (e.g., a few MB)? We typically do not include large files because that lengthens the time of our test runs significantly. Thanks!
BTW, @icaro-00 : Do you have a file that is much smaller that we could include in our test data set (e.g., a few MB)? We typically do not include large files because that lengthens the time of our test runs significantly. Thanks!
Hi @leewujung, the smallest find I could find is 300MB. Here is the link: https://wetransfer.com/downloads/1e20766c3f67ddccda9cfbcecb20edec20231116101129/4d5f8f
Is the error fixed and the updated code available already? Is it going to be fixed with the 0.8.2 release?
Thank you!
I actually managed to find another smaller file, 20MB.
Here the link: https://wetransfer.com/downloads/f54d5fd680e8d724926cd7849dfe782020231116120052/2d0d2b
Thanks Vogt the files @icaro-00 !
You could try to pip install the dev branch that had the fix included, like shown here
Our goal is to get v0.8.2 out on Nov 20, so you could also wait for that if it’s not too far away for you.
@praneethratna : I added the 20MB file into the google folder: ek80/D20230804-T083032.raw
. Please add a test for testing for the stored receiver_sampling_frequency
value when you have a chance. Thank you!
Thanks Vogt the files @icaro-00 !
You could try to pip install the dev branch that had the fix included, like shown here
Our goal is to get v0.8.2 out on Nov 20, so you could also wait for that if it’s not too far away for you.
Thank you for the info @leewujung, I will wait for Nov 20, and thanks for helping on this!
Addresses #1217 by adding a check for
receiver_sampling_frequency
not being equal to 0 or else setting it to its default value.CC @leewujung