Open markwilkinson opened 3 months ago
Why not? It looks sensible to me to include provenance information on a test result. It is also needed to address some of the requirements gathered. This does not mean that all test result may include it. For example, a result may be part of a set that includes the provenance information
El mar., 19 mar. 2024 8:45 a. m., Mark Wilkinson @.***> escribió:
Test results will not be aware of the process that generated them.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/OSTrails/FAIR_assessment_output_specification/issues/2, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALTIGQ5BTSKASHXABS7OLTYY7UJFAVCNFSM6AAAAABE5AIIPKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE4TIMRVHAYTINA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
I guess it depends on what an "Assessment activity" is... in general, we are using the word "Assessment" to refer to the application of multiple tests to a digital object, so in that case, the test will not be aware of the Assessment activity.
The test is indeed not aware. But this is about the result of a test. The test result should point to the activity that generated it.
If you don't like it that way, you can always use the prov:generated
inverse property and link from the activity to the test. It's equivalent.
Test results will not be aware of the process that generated them.