Closed drivebyer closed 5 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 0%
with 5 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 39.57%. Comparing base (
d121d86
) to head (59ad503
). Report is 29 commits behind head on master.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
controllers/rediscluster_controller.go | 0.00% | 4 Missing and 1 partial :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
close #860
The operator should rely on the actual status queried from the redis cluster, not just the status it assumes. Otherwise, we might end up with outdated information, leading to downsizing even when the desired leader count is met.
when i scale in cluster from 6 shards to 3 shards, the log
Redis cluster is downscaling
show more than 3 times. see:Type of change
Checklist
Additional Context