Yes, renaming "Companies" to "Organizations" could make sense, especially if the entities you're referring to aren't strictly for-profit businesses or if you're including a broader range of entities like non-profits, government bodies, or other types of groups.
Benefits of Using "Organizations":
Inclusive Terminology: It’s more inclusive and can refer to any structured group of people, not just commercial enterprises.
Clarity: If the platform caters to a diverse set of users, "Organizations" provides a clearer understanding that the platform is not limited to companies alone.
Flexibility: It allows for future expansion of the platform’s scope without needing to rebrand or change terminology again.
If your platform is meant to serve a variety of entity types, "Organizations" would likely be a better fit.
Hello @sagnik3788! You've been assigned to OWASP-BLT/BLT. You have 24 hours to complete a pull request. To place a bid and potentially earn some BCH, type /bid [amount in BCH] [BCH address].
Yes, renaming "Companies" to "Organizations" could make sense, especially if the entities you're referring to aren't strictly for-profit businesses or if you're including a broader range of entities like non-profits, government bodies, or other types of groups.
Benefits of Using "Organizations":
Inclusive Terminology: It’s more inclusive and can refer to any structured group of people, not just commercial enterprises. Clarity: If the platform caters to a diverse set of users, "Organizations" provides a clearer understanding that the platform is not limited to companies alone. Flexibility: It allows for future expansion of the platform’s scope without needing to rebrand or change terminology again. If your platform is meant to serve a variety of entity types, "Organizations" would likely be a better fit.