Closed hartwork closed 3 years ago
Agree. This is something more for sooner then later.
I suggest the cover needs to be adjusted (cover.xcf) assets/first. Then if you have a peek at the application top 10:
the verbose description is on the TOC
I pushed a new image (the WASP looks alos better now). Wasn't able though to include a link in the GIMP file for owasp.org and the license, that would be great too.
Second point to mention again: next page (TOC) needs a more thorough description of the license.
closed via 56b3df6
Thank you!
Hi!
There is a pile of Creative Commons licenses and the current logo used on the cover keeps the license very vague. I also didn't find any place in the document, where the license would be mentioned with more precision — maybe #4 is related? It would be nice to have "CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International" and maybe its logo parts, instead.
Thanks!