test whether gitbook still shows proper references to the glossary terms
test whether the new pipeline is able to have glossary links
if both 1 and 2 are a "no", just follow the actions, 1 is no or 2 is a no: update the references to both documents accordingly, but do make sure we generate one from the other.
QUESTION: Is there a reason why the MASVS has 2 glossaries (even differently formatted) :thinking_face: ? https://github.com/OWASP/owasp-masvs/blob/master/Document/0x90-Appendix-A_Glossary.md https://github.com/OWASP/owasp-masvs/blob/master/Document/GLOSSARY.md
Actions to take: use 1, remove 2 and make sure that references are referenced to 1.