line 13: "The Mobile Application Security Verification Standard can be used as an open book verification of a mobile app". Not sure I'm parsing the sentence correctly, but maybe it would be clearer to say something like: "It is suggested that to verify compliance of a mobile app with this standard, an open book review is performed, which provides the testers with open and [...]"
line 15: MASVS V1 is mentioned for the first time here, which confused me a bit (I was wondering if you meant MASVS L1). Only when I looked back at the directory index I realized that the standard is split into different chapters that are numbered Vx. It might be worth to include in the "how to use MASVS" section a paragraph that describes how MASVS is structured.
line 13: "The Mobile Application Security Verification Standard can be used as an open book verification of a mobile app". Not sure I'm parsing the sentence correctly, but maybe it would be clearer to say something like: "It is suggested that to verify compliance of a mobile app with this standard, an open book review is performed, which provides the testers with open and [...]"
line 15: MASVS V1 is mentioned for the first time here, which confused me a bit (I was wondering if you meant MASVS L1). Only when I looked back at the directory index I realized that the standard is split into different chapters that are numbered Vx. It might be worth to include in the "how to use MASVS" section a paragraph that describes how MASVS is structured.
line 28: Huge +1 to requiring manual tests :)