fixed issue #1031

[snowkluster]

This PR fixes OWASP/wstg#1031 .

• [x] This PR handles the issue and requires no additional PRs.
• [x] You have validated the need for this change.

What did this PR accomplish?

• Fixed broken link that lead to 404

[github-actions[bot]]

The following mistakes were identified:

/home/runner/work/wstg/wstg/document/2-Introduction/README.md 7:404 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “life cycle”, use “lifecycle” instead terminology 11:441 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “life cycle”, use “lifecycle” instead terminology 27:478 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “Internet”, use “internet” instead terminology 31:54 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “life cycle”, use “lifecycle” instead terminology 43:111 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “life cycle”, use “lifecycle” instead terminology 43:399 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “Life Cycle”, use “lifecycle” instead terminology 94:43 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “Internet”, use “internet” instead terminology 101:65 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “Life Cycle”, use “lifecycle” instead terminology 174:398 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “life-cycle”, use “lifecycle” instead terminology 577:463 ✖ Incorrect usage of the term: “front end”, use “frontend” instead terminology

[github-actions[bot]]

The following links are broken: FILE:document/2-Introduction/README.md [✖] https://www.it-cisq.org/the-cost-of-poor-software-quality-in-the-us-a-2020-report/ → Status: 403

[kingthorin]

I've hidden the link check result, it was a false positive.

I understand the terminology lint issues weren't introduced by your changes but if you could address them that'd be great.

[snowkluster]

I've hidden the link check result, it was a false positive.

I understand the terminology lint issues weren't introduced by your changes but if you could address them that'd be great.

will do

[github-actions[bot]]

The following links are broken: FILE:document/2-Introduction/README.md [✖] https://www.it-cisq.org/the-cost-of-poor-software-quality-in-the-us-a-2020-report/ → Status: 403