Closed jagoosw closed 10 months ago
We need to update the example in the README.md
+ docs landing page.
Attention: 1 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
1658ddf
) 64.18% compared to head (f610b33
) 64.19%. Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This is now failing from a bug in Oceananigans, I'll make a PR there (https://github.com/CliMA/Oceananigans.jl/pull/3383) and maybe just change how the temperature is set in this example for now (since it doesn't have any movement it can just be a function field instead).
Actually changing this example to have a function field makes it quite messy since T is a tracer required by the bgc model so we would have to predefined all of the tracers like:
clock = Clock(; time = 0.0)
T = FunctionField{Center, Center, Center}(temp, grid; clock)
P = CenterField(grid)
N = CenterField(grid)
model = NonhydrostaticModel(..., tracers = (; N, P, T))
Which takes away from our demonstration of the automatic setup. I am going to try and run the example with a temperature forcing that is the derivative of the prescribed temperature and see if the time resolution is sufficient for it to work correctly.
Should we merge #156 then this with a minorpatch version update, then #155 then minor release?
We can just do a minor update when all three are merged?
Oh yeah I meant patch but we can just merge them all and do a minor release when #155 is merged
Some (internal) fixes required for light attenuation.