Open stevencl840 opened 4 months ago
Curious how this would work in practice - we extensively use VCS and the Terraform provider in conjunction with each other, as VCS is limited to deployment processes/project variables and the like, while we use Terraform to fill in the gaps such as Channels.
If this were to be implemented and VCS projects were locked off from any modifications via the Terraform provider, I'd be pretty devastated if it couldn't be opted out of :(
Describe the bug It is possible to use the Octopus Deploy Terraform Provider to modify a Project stored in Git, but this results in an inconsistent project state.
Steps to reproduce
Expected behavior I would expect the provider to reject any request to update a project that is stored in version control.
Logs and other supporting information
Screenshots
Environment and versions:
Windows
Additional context Add any other context about the problem here.