Closed tiger5226 closed 5 years ago
to clarify, you don't actually use getclaimsintrie?
and the getclaimsforname has an error in it; the new normalized_name field isn't actually the normalized name until after the hard-fork hits. I can make a change to that. Let me know what you want. I'm thinking to leave it as name until the fork and then call it normalized_name after the fork. That way you can detect the change by what data is there. (The individual claims will have the name field in them either way.)
to clarify, you don't actually use getclaimsintrie?
Correct. I do not use this RPC call. I use getclaimsforname
.
and the getclaimsforname has an error in it; the new normalized_name field isn't actually the normalized name until after the hard-fork hits.
Is this an error or a feature? Either way, I was planning on doing full sync after the fork any way, so I don't think this is a problem for Chainquery as it will get updated either way after the fork.
I can make a change to that.
No I don't think anything is needed here.
solved with 1.7 release
normalized_name
column to theclaim
table.getclaimsforname
to receive the newnormalized_name
field from the RPC response.