We don't seem to have a clear and consistent statement about the syntax of these obhects.
In README.md, we say that the nonce of a bundle is parsed as an epoch num and sequence num.
In inclusion.md, we talk about
the other fields of the bundle (including epoch number, sequence number, and signature)
Is this signature the signature of the transaction that actually submitted the bundle?
If so, should it even be mentioned here?
We do not say anywhere what (if any) syntax a non-priority tx has.
I think it is an opaque object as far as this spec is concerned, and if that is correct, I think we should say as much.
We don't seem to have a clear and consistent statement about the syntax of these obhects.
In README.md, we say that the nonce of a bundle is parsed as an epoch num and sequence num. In inclusion.md, we talk about
Is this signature the signature of the transaction that actually submitted the bundle? If so, should it even be mentioned here? We do not say anywhere what (if any) syntax a non-priority tx has. I think it is an opaque object as far as this spec is concerned, and if that is correct, I think we should say as much.