search

Ofunniku / dwarftherapist

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/dwarftherapist
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

New "Group By" Option For Total Skill Levels #180

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Sorting by legendary/non-legendary is nice, but I'd also like a few other
ways of sorting by skill:

1) Use each dwarf's highest skill for sorting.
2) Sort by a particular skill.
2) Use the sum of their skills for sorting (with an option to ignore skills
below a certain level).

This would help with figuring out which dwarfs need more training, which
have had enough training, which ones you want to import preferred materials
for in case they have a mood, and probably other things.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by khym.cha...@gmail.com on 5 Jan 2010 at 1:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
You currently can sort by a dwarf's skill level (ascending or descending) by 
clicking
on the skill name.  This is different than the Group By "Legendary Status" 
(though
the skill sort works there also).  Would that meet your needs for #1 and #2?

Regarding #3, it sounds like you're looking for a new Group By option that 
would be
nodes like "Insanely Skilled", "Highly Skilled", ... , "Slightly Skilled" and
"Unskilled".  This would use a summary of their skill levels, I would think.  
Is that
what you're looking for approximately?

Original comment by mochn...@gmail.com on 22 Feb 2010 at 11:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
From the original post I think he's talking about "grouping by" and not so much 
"sorting 
by"

I agree a group by highest level range may be more useful than the "Legends vs 
Losers" 
grouping that was really meant to just be tongue in cheek.

A total skill-levels grouping can be done and would be useful.

As for the other options mentioned, new tickets should be made for them 
separately.

Original comment by treyst...@gmail.com on 6 Apr 2010 at 6:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was closed by revision fd14b48afe.

Original comment by treyst...@gmail.com on 24 Apr 2010 at 10:23