Closed vladkozlov69 closed 1 year ago
according to #8 this could be a "longsys 173" since it has the same signature... Unfortunately I'm at the moment to busy ("making money for a living") but I'm happy for every pull request ...
Looks like we already have support for these cards in this opened PR: https://github.com/Ognian/sdmon/pull/12
{
"version": "",
"date": "2023-10-04T10:19:07.000Z",
"device":"/dev/mmcblk1",
"addTime": "false",
"signature":"0x70 0x58",
"Longsys":"true",
"SMARTVersions": 3,
"sizeOfDevSMART": 60,
"originalBadBlock": 16,
"increaseBadBlock": 0,
"writeAllSectNum": 28226 Sector(512Byte),
"replaceBlockLeft": 80,
"degreOfWear": 0.00 Cycle,
"sectorTotal": 123596800,
"remainLifeTime": 100%,
"remainWrGBNum": 196.83TB,
"lifeTimeTotal": 3000.00 Cycle,
"phyWrGBNum": 0.00TB,
"success":true
}
Then this issue can be closed after merging that PR
@vladkozlov69 ups, so I merged the pull request and fixed the logic... Can you please check if the newly build Development version work with your card?
@Ognian yes, newly build Development version works with my card just fine! Thanks.
Hi guys,
I just got from Amazon some Viofo Industrial cards - 32G and Viofo 64G.
Viofo Industrial 32G output looks pretty similar to Apacer so I believe it's just a rebranded card:
However Viofo Industrial 64G is not so bright... :(
Dangled manufactureYYMMDD attribute suggests that CMD56 output blob format is different so I dumped it:
Any ideas what it could be?